Winesburg and "Prufrock"
Embedded
in literature of different times and forms are common ties that bind them
together thematically. Two of the recent works we have read in class are an
ideal representation of this idea. Both the novel Winesburg, Ohio by Sherwood Anderson and the poem “The Love Song of
J. Alfred Prufrock” (which I will refer to as “Prufrock”) by T. S. Eliot
consist of common elements that tie them together, although different forms of
literature. Both literary works illustrate ideas of fragmentation, disillusionment,
and question of the meaning of life.
The
most prevalent similarity lies in the structure of the two literary works as
well. The structure of Winesburg consists of various stories of different
characters all tied together by a repeating character, George Willard.
Similarly, “Prufrock” consists of different sections that each create a
different image, but are tied together by a similar speaker. By having
different parts to create a whole, the literary works call attention to the
details within each individual section, allowing us to connect smaller details
to the meaning of the work as whole.
But
the thematic connection lies beyond the fragmentation itself, focusing upon what
this fragmentation insinuates about dismemberment and disillusionment. A common
demonstration of this concept is seen in how both works use body parts heavily
– separating them from the individual as a whole and focusing on the specific
body part. This is seen in Winesburg throughout the novel. It mentions the
“slender expressive fingers” (Anderson 6) of Wing Biddlebaum, the “white beard
and huge nose” (Anderson 10) of Doctor Reefy, and the “long white hands” of
Elizabeth Willard (Anderson 14). This dismemberment takes place to divert the
attention from the large picture to distinct details that help create a persona
for the characters. Similarly, “Prufrock” exhibits this same sort of
dismemberment of the individual:
“And I have known the arms
already, known them all–
Arms that are braceleted and
white and bare
[But in lamplight, downed with
light down hair!]
It is perfume from a dress
That makes me so digress?
Arms that lie along a table, or
wrap about a shawl."
Instead of speaking about the
women, Elliot refers to their arms and dresses, perfume and shawls. This shows
a fragmentation and dismemberment of the individual and highlights these
details to show that the speaker feels admiring, yet out of place. Furthering
this similarity lies in the tone and message of the two works as well.
Throughout most of “Prufrock” there is a sense of aloofness in the speaker and
a sense of disillusionment. This disillusionment transfers itself into Winesburg
as well within characters such as Elizabeth Willard who gradually becomes
separated from herself, other people, and God. Another example of this would be
Wash Williams, who appears to believe nothing in the world is worth noting
other than himself. This brings the common idea of some sort of tragedy in the
characters in Winesburg and the speaker in “Prufrock” that makes them feel
separated from themselves, others, and God.
This disillusionment spurs the
additional question of the meaning of life, and what an individual should seek
to do with his life. In both Winesburg,
Ohio and “Prufrock”, the overarching question of the meaning of life is prominent
in enhancing the works thematically. In “Prufrock” there are many instances the
speaker questions his current state of life and his future:
“In a minute there is time
For decisions and revision which
a minute will reverse
….
And should I then presume
And how should I begin?”
In Winesburg, Ohio, George Willard is a young man that questions how
he should go about his own life. This sort of question of development is
apparent in the story of “Sophistication”, which ended with my own question of
whether George had indeed matured. Both Winesburg and “Prufrock” display people
that are struggling coming to terms with their existence and are unsure of what
to do with their futures.
These thematic elements allowed
for me to tie these overarching ideas to the larger scope of literature,
something that brings out feelings I really can’t help but appreciate.
Dear A Silent Caller,
ReplyDeleteI concur. Disillusionment is probably the primary theme that is seen throughout both these texts, but when I think of disillusionment, I think of it as an umbrella to the past. Under this feelings of disappointment that results from unsatisfactory, come the need to identify the root cause of of ones unhappiness. Why is someone facing disillusionment? Could it simply be due to regret of the past...or was there an underlying cause? I think that in both texts, there was an underlying cause. Yes, they both were depressed, constantly trying to remember the past and tell it to the world...but there is more to that. I feel as if both the characters lacked the understanding of the human journey- that is, everyone becomes old, and with aging comes:flaws, lack of innocence, dismissal of naiveness, and most important loss of the pureness provided by youth. Knowing that one day, these will all come to end, is what, i think, they are struggling with. Perhaps every human being undergoes this sense of realization, and that is the true introspection that you are referring to.